MEASURE T, THE FAIR UTILITY TAX ACT, DEFEATED
BY OPPONENT'S $394,000
TAX RELIEF FOR COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES AND
THOSE WITH A YEARLY INCOME OF MORE THAN $25,000 DENIED
By election day, November 5th, the Sacramento
City Council's Recipient Committee, aided by the Sacramento Chamber of
Commerce, in opposing Measure T spent about $394,000, mostly on mail-out
scare type hit pieces to city voters. The Sacramento Bee remarked it:
"may be the most spent on a Sacramento City initiative". This resulted
in defeat of the League's effort to reduce the 7.5% Utility User Tax (UUT)
to 2.5% over five years. However Measure T's expansion of the utility
tax rebate program to all residents whose yearly income is less than $25,000
has succeeded. And thus, as the Bee also related in its Editorial supporting
Measure T, "From the perspective of those who depend on the city for a
pay-check or a development subsidy, there's never a good time to lower
a tax, even one as regressive as the utility tax." So, from those who
seek and get the City's largess, the money flowed.
From the outset the League set out to achieve
three goals, i.e., get Measure T on the ballot, reduce the utility tax
to 2.5% over 5 years, and expand the tax rebate to all with yearly earnings
less than $25,000. The first two were achieved before election-day even
arrived. The League committed its General Fund to put Measure T on the
ballot. On May 23rd the City agreed, tentatively, to expand the rebate
for a year in the identical manner proposed in the League's Ballot initiative.
The League believes this was done, and advertised, in an attempt to defeat
our signature gathering effort. It failed. Over 15,000 signatures were
gathered in a month and a half, and Measure T was on the ballot. The financial
assault, creating the egregious mailed hit pieces ensued. The Sacramento
Bee saw through the opponent's, and the City run charade, endorsed Measure
T and urged a YES Vote. Notwithstanding the moneyed assault, the City,
knowing Measure T might still pass, on October 22nd, 13 days before the
election, passed a Resolution making the rebate program permanent, and
heralded the move in its final assault. And the tax reduction, the last
of the League's three goals was defeated. But even in defeat, the League,
by forcing the rebate issue, won for about 47,000 Sacramento City residents
the capability to get the utility taxes they pay returned to them. And
on January 1st it becomes law, which cannot be repealed without a vote
of the City's electorate. And the rest of the taxpayers and commercial
enterprises got nothing, except the pleasure of continuing to pay a utility
tax three times higher than anywhere else in the County and the surrounding
Cities!
Joe Sullivan, Executive Director
|